{"id":16053,"date":"2011-09-04T16:57:27","date_gmt":"2011-09-04T16:57:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mixedracestudies.org\/wordpress\/?p=16053"},"modified":"2017-02-27T20:53:32","modified_gmt":"2017-02-27T20:53:32","slug":"white-weddings-the-incredible-staying-power-of-the-laws-against-interracial-marriage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/?p=16053","title":{"rendered":"White Weddings: The incredible staying power of the laws against interracial marriage"},"content":{"rendered":"

White Weddings: The incredible staying power of the laws against interracial marriage<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Slate<\/a>
\n1999-06-15<\/p>\n

David Greenberg<\/a><\/strong>, Associate Professor History, Journalism & Media Studies
\nRutgers University<\/em><\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Last week, the Alabama<\/a> Senate voted to repeal the state’s constitutional prohibition against interracial marriage, 32 years after the Supreme Court struck down Virginia’s similar ban<\/a>. Hadn’t these archaic laws gone out with Bull Connor<\/a>? I asked myself as I read the news account. And haven’t we been hearing that America has rediscovered the melting pot, that in another generation or two we’ll all be “cablinasian,” like Tiger Woods<\/a>?…<\/p>\n

…When you think about it, it makes sense that some Alabamians found it hard to jettison overnight a 300-year-old custom. Laws against interracial marriage\u2014and the taboos against black-white sex that they codify\u2014have been the central weapon in the oppression of African-Americans since the dawn of slavery. President Abraham Lincoln’s<\/a> detractors charged him in the 1864 presidential campaign with promoting the mongrelization of the races<\/a> (that’s where the coinage “miscegenation<\/a>,” which now sounds racist, comes from). Enemies of the 20th-century civil rights movement predicted that the repeal of Jim Crow laws<\/a> would, as one Alabama state senator put it, “open the bedroom doors of our white women to black men.” Fears of black sexuality have been responsible for some of the most notorious incidents of anti-black violence and persecution, from the Scottsboro Boys<\/a> to Emmett Till<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Intermarriage bans arose in the late 1600s, when tobacco planters in Virginia<\/a> needed to shore up their new institution of slavery. In previous decades, before slavery took hold, interracial sex was more prevalent than at any other time in American history.<\/strong> White and black laborers lived and worked side by side and naturally became intimate. Even interracial marriage, though uncommon, was allowed. But as race slavery replaced servitude as the South’s labor force, interracial sex threatened to blur the distinctions between white and black\u2014and thus between free and slave. <\/strong>Virginia began categorizing a child as free or slave according to the mother’s status (which was easier to determine than the father’s), and so in 1691 the assembly passed a law to make sure that women didn’t bear mixed-race children. The law banned “negroes, mulatto’s<\/a> and Indians intermarrying with English, or other white women, [and] their unlawfull accompanying with one another.” Since the society was heavily male, the prohibition on unions between white women and nonwhite men also lessened the white men’s competition for mates. (In contrast, sex between male slave owners and their female slaves–which often meant rape\u2014was common. It typically met with light punishment, if any at all.)…<\/p>\n

Read the entire article here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Last week, the Alabama Senate voted to repeal the state’s constitutional prohibition against interracial marriage, 32 years after the Supreme Court struck down Virginia’s similar ban. Hadn’t these archaic laws gone out with Bull Connor? I asked myself as I read the news account. And haven’t we been hearing that America has rediscovered the melting pot, that in another generation or two we’ll all be “cablinasian,” like Tiger Woods?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[459,1467,8,26,394,20],"tags":[7441,70,7435,7436],"class_list":["post-16053","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-history","category-law","category-media-archive","category-politics","category-socialscience","category-usa","tag-david-greenberg","tag-loving-v-virginia","tag-slate","tag-slate-magazine"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16053","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=16053"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16053\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":51926,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16053\/revisions\/51926"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=16053"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=16053"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=16053"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}