{"id":22932,"date":"2012-05-05T22:46:14","date_gmt":"2012-05-05T22:46:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mixedracestudies.org\/wordpress\/?p=22932"},"modified":"2012-05-06T01:14:10","modified_gmt":"2012-05-06T01:14:10","slug":"going-viral-stedmans-narrative-textual-variation-and-life-in-atlantic-studies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/?p=22932","title":{"rendered":"Going Viral: Stedman&#8217;s Narrative, Textual Variation, and Life in Atlantic Studies"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.rc.umd.edu\/praxis\/circulations\/HTML\/abstracts.html#KennedyAbstract\" target=\"_blank\"><em><strong>Going Viral: Stedman&#8217;s Narrative, Textual Variation, and Life in Atlantic Studies<\/strong><\/em><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.rc.umd.edu\/praxis\/\" target=\"_blank\">Romantic Circles Praxis Series<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.rc.umd.edu\/praxis\/circulations\/index.html\" target=\"_blank\">Circulations: Romanticism and the Black Atlantic<\/a><br \/>\nOctober 2011<br \/>\n47 paragraphs<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"mailto:dmk336@psu.edu\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Dustin Kennedy<\/strong><\/a><br \/>\nEnglish Department<br \/>\n<em>The Pennsylvania State University<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The current multiplex configuration of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/John_Gabriel_Stedman\" target=\"_blank\">Stedman&#8217;s<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/John_Gabriel_Stedman#Stedman.27s_Narrative\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Narrative<\/em><\/a> emerged in 1988, the result of Richard and Sally Price&#8217;s new scholarly edition. The Prices&#8217; text transcribed Stedman&#8217;s 1790 manuscript version aiming to restore his original authorial intent and exposing the extent to which the text had been altered by Stedman&#8217;s first editor, Joseph Johnson. Both versions of the <em>Narrative<\/em> are troubled by what they cannot contain, whether it be the sexual exploitation made possible by plantation-slavery, or the inter-racial desire that would eventually mark Stedman&#8217;s <em>Narrative<\/em> as a singular example of resistance to the exploitations inherent in the eighteenth-century Atlantic world. Stedman was more than a traveler in <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Surinam\" target=\"_blank\">Surinam<\/a>, and he was also more than a colonial agent and oppressor. The <em>Narrative<\/em> can be read as the outgrowth of social subjectivity categories that typify the operation of the larger plantation slavery system in the West Indies and South America, but it must also be recognized in its particularity. In the following sections, I will consider what happens when Stedman&#8217;s authorship becomes displaced in the larger archive \u2013 how critics rewrite what they read, how an author becomes a character, and above all else, how textual changes challenge criticism&#8217;s reduction of Stedman to imperialist.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>John Gabriel Stedman&#8217;s <em>Narrative of a Five Years&#8217; Expedition Against the Revolted Negroes of Surinam<\/em> (1796) is a very complicated text. It tells the story of an officer in  the Scots Brigade deployed in 1772 to the Dutch-controlled colony of  Surinam to suppress an armed black revolt against plantation slavery. It  also exposes the cruelty of both slavery and military authority, while  providing a rare account of a wide spectrum of colonial society. It  takes advantage of Stedman&#8217;s role as a colonial authority, writing from  the privileged perspective of the colonial gaze, but it also challenges  many assumptions and prejudices natural to the colonizer&#8217;s world view.  Stedman&#8217;s <em>Narrative<\/em> is gaining  importance in Atlantic Studies, because it both reflects the larger  experience of circum-Atlantic circulation in the Age of Revolution and  provides a unique perspective that differs from other primary material  from the period. It should be possible to differentiate between what is  typical of society and what is particular to an individual&#8217;s perspective  in Stedman&#8217;s Narrative, right? There is just one problem: there is more than one Stedman&#8217;s <em>Narrative<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Today&#8217;s reader is in a position to understand the role that variation  plays in the construction and interpretation of Stedman&#8217;s <em>Narrative<\/em>.  Contemporary culture is comfortable with the idea of media going  \u201cviral,\u201d taking on a life of its own as it is experienced and altered by  users on the net. Likewise, a type of reading that is attentive to  reference and mutation is necessary for Stedman&#8217;s <em>Narrative<\/em> because of the proliferation of versions that have emerged over the  more than two-hundred year history of its publication legacy&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;Stedman altered the conventions of British society both in his daily  life and in his public writings by incorporating new experiences of  eighteenth-century life within the familiar narratives. Following his  return to Europe, Stedman produced his <em>Narrative<\/em> for print while keeping a journal that records his exceptional family\u2019s  experience in British society. In order to make sense of his time in  Surinam, Stedman drew from literary conventions, characters, and  narratives to tell his story. His private writings from the same period  record his mixed-race, mixed-nationality household from the domestic  perspective, depicting both the strained relationship between Stedman&#8217;s  Dutch wife, Adrianna, and Johnny, as well as Stedman\u2019s emphatic  inclusion of Johnny within traditional familial relationships. If  Stedman \u201cre-wrote\u201d his and Joanna&#8217;s relationship into the normative  codes of domesticity, then his journalistic evidence of an analogous  effort to establish Johnny socially within the codes of relation and  inheritance tempers the critical assumption that such re-writing is  necessarily aligned with a system of colonial domination..Stedman\u2019s readiness to bend the normative forces of domesticity to  include the potential for legitimized inter-racial relationships is a  radically destabilizing social scenario. While the racial power dynamics  of plantation slavery made Joanna sexually available to Stedman in  Surinam, his continual effort to endow their relationship with consent  and love in his writings generated cultural tension by denying Joanna&#8217;s  reduction to a sexual commodity. Stedman&#8217;s \u201ccleaning up\u201d of the sexual  relations in the colonial system by scripting them within the codes of  the British middle class family is then both at once a problematic  erasure of colonial power and a powerful challenge of the homogenous  constitution of British society. Stedman&#8217;s re-writing of Joanna denies  her reduction to a sexual commodity, implicitly denying his own  association as a white male consumer of subjugated women. The mitigating  quality of this particular recorded relationship is that the denial  does not transpire in silence as so many others did.<\/p>\n<p>At the end the five years expedition, Stedman left Joanna and Johnny in Surinam to return to Europe. In the <em>Narrative<\/em>,  Joanna is depicted as having the agency to decide not to return with  Stedman \u201cfirst from a Consciousness that with propriety she had not the  disposal of herself &#8211; &amp; Secondly from pride, wishing in her Present  Condition Rather to be one of the first amongst her own Class in  America, than as she was well Convinced to be the last in Europe at  least till such time as fortune should enable me to establish her above  dependance\u201d (1988, 603). The only record of Joanna\u2019s choice is inundated  with Stedman\u2019s narrative authority, and in itself is at best a  compromised version of what grounds their domestic relationship may have  entailed. Joanna&#8217;s choice in this moment signals a much wider  comprehension of what her and Stedman&#8217;s relationship would mean in the  wider context of colonization, rather than being limited to the local  plantation society. When the <em>Narrative<\/em> gives Joanna agency, however, it exonerates Stedman of not only his  role as a colonial exploiter of women (Joanna&#8217;s choice of separation is  made on other grounds), but also his abandonment. If the Stedman Archive  was limited to the core texts, it would be difficult to argue that  Stedman has been judged unfairly as a practitioner of the colonial  romance and the mystification that authorship has the power to produce  over any scene. By reading this moment in the Narrative  against the wider collection of journals and textual variation in the  archive, it becomes clear that their domestic relationship remained in  place even while they were separated by vast geographic distance.  Following Joanna&#8217;s death three years later (reputedly by poisoning),  Johnny, who had been manumitted before Stedman\u2019s return, traveled to  Europe to live with his father.<a href=\"http:\/\/www.rc.umd.edu\/praxis\/circulations\/HTML\/praxis.2011.kennedy.html#13\"><\/a> The Stedman family in Europe was then composed of Stedman, his Dutch  wife Adrianna (whom he married while Joanna was yet alive), and Johnny&#8230;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Read the entire article <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rc.umd.edu\/praxis\/circulations\/HTML\/praxis.2011.kennedy.html\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Going Viral: Stedman&#8217;s Narrative, Textual Variation, and Life in Atlantic Studies Romantic Circles Praxis Series Circulations: Romanticism and the Black Atlantic October 2011 47 paragraphs Dustin Kennedy English Department The Pennsylvania State University The current multiplex configuration of Stedman&#8217;s Narrative emerged in 1988, the result of Richard and Sally Price&#8217;s new scholarly edition. The Prices&#8217; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,1196,6],"tags":[10652,10651,475,10653],"class_list":["post-22932","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-articles","category-literary-criticism","category-new-media","tag-dustin-kennedy","tag-john-gabriel-stedman","tag-john-stedman","tag-romantic-circles-praxis-series"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22932","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=22932"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22932\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=22932"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=22932"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=22932"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}