{"id":5050,"date":"2010-02-07T02:57:02","date_gmt":"2010-02-07T02:57:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mixedracestudies.org\/wordpress\/?p=5050"},"modified":"2015-12-07T00:42:50","modified_gmt":"2015-12-07T00:42:50","slug":"reconstruction-segregation-and-miscegenation-interracial-marriage-and-the-law-in-the-lower-south-1865-1900","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/?p=5050","title":{"rendered":"Reconstruction, Segregation, and Miscegenation: Interracial Marriage and the Law in the Lower South, 1865-1900"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><em><a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1080\/14664650500121827\" target=\"_blank\">Reconstruction, Segregation, and Miscegenation: Interracial Marriage and the Law in the Lower South, 1865-1900<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/loi\/fanc20\" target=\"_blank\">American Nineteenth Century History<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/toc\/fanc20\/6\/1\" target=\"_blank\">Volume 6, Issue 1<\/a><br \/>\nMarch 2005<br \/>\npages 57-76<br \/>\nDOI: <a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1080\/14664650500121827\" target=\"_blank\">10.1080\/14664650500121827<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.history.vt.edu\/faculty\/Wallenstein\/index.htm\" target=\"_blank\">Peter Wallenstein<\/a><\/strong>, Professor of History<br \/>\n<em>Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University<\/em><\/p>\n<p>On the eve of Congressional <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Reconstruction_era_of_the_United_States\" target=\"_blank\">Reconstruction<\/a>, all seven states of the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Deep_South\" target=\"_blank\">Lower South<\/a> had laws against interracial marriage. During the Republican interlude that began in 1867-68, six of the seven states (all but <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Georgia_(U.S._state)\" target=\"_blank\">Georgia<\/a>) suspended those laws, whether through judicial invalidation or legislative repeal. Yet by 1894 all six had restored such bans. The trajectory of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mixedracestudies.org\/?p=450\" target=\"_blank\">miscegenation<\/a> laws in the Lower South between 1865 and 1900 permits a reconsideration of the range of possibilities the Reconstruction era brought to public policy. More than that, it forces a reconsideration of the origins of the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Jim_Crow_laws\" target=\"_blank\">Jim Crow<\/a> South. Legally mandated segregation in public transit, as <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/C._Vann_Woodward\" target=\"_blank\">C. Vann Woodward<\/a> observed in 1955, took hold late in the century. But such segregation in public education, as Howard R. Rabinowitz pointed out with his formula &#8216;from exclusion to segregation,&#8217; originated during the first postwar years. Segregation on the marital front &#8211; universal at the start of the period and again at the end, but relaxed in most Lower South states for a time in between &#8211; combined the two patterns into yet a third. Adding another layer of complexity was the issue of where the color line was located, and thus which individuals were classified on each side of it.<\/p>\n<p>Read or purchase the article <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/abs\/10.1080\/14664650500121827#aHR0cDovL3d3dy50YW5kZm9ubGluZS5jb20vZG9pL3BkZi8xMC4xMDgwLzE0NjY0NjUwNTAwMTIxODI3QEBAMA==\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Reconstruction, Segregation, and Miscegenation: Interracial Marriage and the Law in the Lower South, 1865-1900 American Nineteenth Century History Volume 6, Issue 1 March 2005 pages 57-76 DOI: 10.1080\/14664650500121827 Peter Wallenstein, Professor of History Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University On the eve of Congressional Reconstruction, all seven states of the Lower South had laws against [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,459,1467,8,20],"tags":[2043,2042],"class_list":["post-5050","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-articles","category-history","category-law","category-media-archive","category-usa","tag-american-nineteenth-century-history","tag-peter-wallenstein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5050","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5050"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5050\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":44490,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5050\/revisions\/44490"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5050"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5050"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5050"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}