{"id":6566,"date":"2010-04-12T01:18:28","date_gmt":"2010-04-12T01:18:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mixedracestudies.org\/wordpress\/?p=6566"},"modified":"2013-10-26T01:44:30","modified_gmt":"2013-10-26T01:44:30","slug":"understanding-race-the-evolution-of-the-meaning-of-race-in-american-law-and-the-impact-of-dna-technology-on-its-meaning-in-the-future","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/?p=6566","title":{"rendered":"Understanding Race: The Evolution of the Meaning of Race in American Law and the Impact of DNA Technology on its Meaning in the Future"},"content":{"rendered":"

Understanding Race: The Evolution of the Meaning of Race in American Law and the Impact of DNA Technology on its Meaning in the Future<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Albany Law Review<\/a>
\nVolume 72, Issue 4<\/a> (2009)
\nPages 1113-1143<\/p>\n

William Q. Lowe<\/strong>
\nAlbany Law School<\/em><\/p>\n

Race has played a decisive role in nearly all aspects of American society, yet its meaning in various contexts remains unclear.\u00a0 Throughout history, individuals have struggled to define \u201crace\u201d as it pertains to science, society, and the law in particular. Although race became a part of the English language in the mid-sixteenth century, it did not take on its modern definition until the early nineteenth century. Scientific, social, and political interpretations of race have gone through an evolutionary process as well. After over two-hundred years of trying to understand its meaning, \u201c[t]he word \u2018race\u2019 defies precise definition in American law.\u201d Countless competing theories exist as to the definition and meaning of race, and the inability for one to earn universal support poses a significant problem to the American legal system. Despite the fact that numerous statutes have been enacted to prohibit racial discrimination throughout all aspects of American society, \u201cthe law has provided no consistent definition of race and no logical way to distinguish members of different races from one another.\u201d<\/p>\n

It has been argued that \u201crace\u201d was first used as a tool to classify individuals during the age of colonial exploration; however, this use was maintained for centuries. Today, classifications based on race are still present in America, and have been found to be permissible in some instances, such as when used to remedy instances of past discrimination. With the predominant role race continues to play in American society, to ensure that all are treated fairly under the law, it is imperative that a single definition of race is applied universally to all Americans. It is foreseeable that advances in science, particularly in DNA<\/a> testing, will allow for a uniform method of determining one\u2019s race.<\/p>\n

This note will discuss the current lack of a settled definition of race in American Law, and the potential role DNA technology can play in remedying the problems associated with it. Part II of this Note will explore the concept of race by examining various definitions of race and how they have evolved into the modern definition. This section will additionally look at the historical understanding of the meaning of race, and the recent divergence from traditional thought. Part III of this Note will analyze the role of race throughout American legal history. This portion of the Note will address historical notions of race in America, the origin of the need to define race, and the treatment of race by the legislature and the courts. Part IV of this Note will discuss current DNA technology and the potential impact it may have of on modern concepts of race, particularly with regard to the law. It is foreseeable that advances in DNA technology will allow scientists to identify and classify individuals through an analysis of their genetic information.<\/p>\n

The first legislative attempt at defining race took place in Virginia<\/a>, nearly one-hundred years before America gained its independence from England, and it was enacted in response to the \u201cuncertain status\u201d of children born with parents of mixed race. The statute was concerned only with the status of mulatto<\/a> children who were born to a black woman, and stated that the race of the mother would be used to determine the race of the child. This policy reflected the biological definition of race, as the skin color of the individual in question was determinative. This statute was in contrast to that of English law, where inheritance followed the paternal line. Ultimately, under the Virginia statute, children born of a free white man and his slave could potentially be considered to be slaves themselves.<\/p>\n

The presence of many free blacks residing in Virginia quickly made this statute unworkable, because it was not easy to determine if a child\u2019s black ancestry came from his or her mother\u2019s side or his or her father\u2019s side. The possibility that a white woman could have a child with a black man, whether he was a slave or a free man, resulted in mulatto children being exiled from Virginia, and ultimately led to the creation of \u201cone-drop rules<\/a>.\u201d Such rules held that an individual would be classified as black, despite the fact that his or her genetic makeup was primarily white…<\/p>\n

Subsequently, Virginia, as well as other states, passed similar laws aimed at the prevention of interracial marriages. Pursuant to such laws, any white person who married a non-white would be exiled from Virginia. The language used in the statute is striking, as interracial marriage is referred to as \u201cthat abominable mixture and spurious issue which hereafter may encrease in this dominion.\u201d This serves as yet another example of the hierarchical system of classification based on race at this time in American history.<\/p>\n

Later statutes based on the \u201cone-drop rule<\/a>\u201d departed from the 1662 Virginia statute in the sense that they did not take a \u201cphysical appearance approach.\u201d Such \u201c[f]ormula-based definitions of race\u201d became increasingly popular in the South, and Booker T. Washington<\/a> provided an accurate description of what they entailed: \u201c[I]f a person is known to have one percent of African blood in his veins, he ceases to be a white man. The ninety-nine percent of Caucasian blood does not weigh by the side of the one-percent of African blood. . . . The person is a Negro every time.\u201d In practice, most states with race-based statutes formed under the \u201cone-drop rule\u201d held that individuals who had at least one black grandparent were legally black. It should be noted, however, that \u201cas the likelihood that more biracial people could be classified as white… the laws became more restrictive… finally culminating in the one-drop rule…<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Read the entire article here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Understanding Race: The Evolution of the Meaning of Race in American Law and the Impact of DNA Technology on its Meaning in the Future Albany Law Review Volume 72, Issue 4 (2009) Pages 1113-1143 William Q. Lowe Albany Law School Race has played a decisive role in nearly all aspects of American society, yet its […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,459,1467,8,394,20,693],"tags":[2740,20757,2745,2744],"class_list":["post-6566","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-articles","category-history","category-law","category-media-archive","category-socialscience","category-usa","category-virginia","tag-albany-law-review","tag-virginia","tag-william-lowe","tag-william-q-lowe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6566","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6566"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6566\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6566"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6566"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6566"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}