{"id":9443,"date":"2010-10-10T23:15:51","date_gmt":"2010-10-10T23:15:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mixedracestudies.org\/wordpress\/?p=9443"},"modified":"2016-12-14T21:42:47","modified_gmt":"2016-12-14T21:42:47","slug":"%e2%80%9cgirl-you-are-not-morena-we-are-negras%e2%80%9d-questioning-the-concept-of-%e2%80%9crace%e2%80%9d-in-southern-bahia-brazil","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/?p=9443","title":{"rendered":"\u201cGirl, You Are Not Morena. We Are Negras!\u201d: Questioning the Concept of \u201cRace\u201d in Southern Bahia, Brazil"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><em><a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1525\/eth.2007.35.3.383\" target=\"_blank\">\u201cGirl, You Are Not Morena. We Are Negras!\u201d: Questioning the Concept of \u201cRace\u201d in Southern Bahia, Brazil<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/journal\/10.1111\/(ISSN)1548-1352\" target=\"_blank\">Ethos<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/etho.2007.35.issue-3\/issuetoc\" target=\"_blank\">Volume 35, Issue 3<\/a> (September 2007)<br \/>\npages 383-409<br \/>\nDOI: <a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1525\/eth.2007.35.3.383\" target=\"_blank\">10.1525\/eth.2007.35.3.383<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.extension.harvard.edu\/about\/faculty\/michael-baran.jsp;jsessionid=LBBJNODOBIDE\" target=\"_blank\">Michael D. Baran<\/a><\/strong>, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Preceptor#Education\" target=\"_blank\">Preceptor<\/a> in Expository Writing<br \/>\n<em>Harvard University<\/em><\/p>\n<p>In 2003, teachers at the municipal high school in <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Belmonte,_Bahia\" target=\"_blank\">Belmonte, Brazil<\/a>, began presenting students with a radically different ideology about racial categorization: an essentialized ideology that defines anyone not &#8220;purely&#8221; <em>branco<\/em> (white) as <em>negro<\/em> (black). This system of categorization conflicts with popular belief in a mixed-race moreno identity based not only on ancestry but also on observable physical features. Through a combination of ethnographic and experimental methods, I examine this apparent clash of ideologies in Belmonte with respect to academic theories on the cognition of race and ethnicity. I show how children and adults integrate certain aspects of essentialism but not others in their constructions of identity and in the way they reason about hypothetical scenarios. These nuanced solutions to the challenges posed by explicit conflicts over supposedly natural categories lead to my own questioning of race in anthropological theory.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>During a March afternoon in 2003, in an eighth-grade science class in Belmonte, Brazil, racial ideologies collided. The lesson of the day dealt with human biology and basic genetics. One student in the class asked the teacher about the biology of race mixing. The teacher then tried to clarify the supposedly natural facts about racial classification for the class. She explained that there were only two races\u2014blonde and blue-eyed <em>brancos<\/em> (whites) and everyone else, considered <em>negros<\/em> (blacks). Although a few heads nodded in approval, most of the class looked confused or upset. The teacher was presenting a particularly extreme form of the racial classification system that black movements have urged Brazilians to adopt, one in which those with any traceable African ancestry would self-identify as \u201c<em>negro<\/em>\u201d as a sign of positive self-image and political solidarity. While this conception of \u201c<em>negro<\/em>\u201d has been animating black movements for at least 25 years in Brazil\u2019s urban centers, it has only now reached more rural areas like Belmonte. And it is not always well received.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI\u2019m <em>morena<\/em>, not <em>negra<\/em>!\u201d2 cried 14-year old Paula. This claim of mixed-race \u201cbrown\u201d identity echoes the more common ideology in Belmonte, academically labeled \u201cracial democracy.\u201d The roots of this ideology extend back to Brazilian sociologist <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Gilberto_Freyre\" target=\"_blank\">Gilberto Freyre\u2019s<\/a> influential 1933 book, <em>The Masters and the Slaves<\/em> (1946). Freyre found strength in the biological and cultural mixing of Portuguese colonizers, native Brazilians, and slaves of African descent, whereas race scientists before him saw only physical and mental weakness (Freyre 1946; Nina Rodrigues 1938; Ramos 1939). Freyre\u2019s foundational story, still framing Brazilian history in school texts, holds that historical mixing has created an ethnically unified population without stark racial divisions or resulting discriminations making Brazil a supposed \u201cracial paradise.\u201d Consistent with this ideology, most residents of Belmonte prefer to self-identify with the inclusive term <em>morena<\/em>, which can be used in various linguistic contexts to refer to almost any combination of physical features. To call someone a \u201cnegra\u201d within this racial democracy ideology is to separate them out from the mixed Brazilian mainstream and denigrate them as a separate category of \u201cpure\u201d black, associated with slavery and Africa. That is just what caused a stir when Ana Maria yelled out to Paula, \u201cGirl, you are not <em>morena<\/em>. We are <em>negras<\/em>!\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In the title of this article, the phrase \u201cQuestioning the Concept of Race\u201d has two levels of significance. First, it refers to the questions of some students as teachers impose new identity categories that clash with previously held \u201ccommon sense\u201d beliefs about race. Second, the title of this article refers to my own questions regarding academic conceptions of race. In the literature on racial categorization in Brazil, I found two different arguments that parallel the debate in the class between Ana Maria and Paula. On the one hand, a more conventional wisdom holds that racial categories in Brazil are multiple (up to hundreds in some cases), they can change from day to day or person to person, and they are based on physical features rather than rules of descent (Harris 1970; Harris and Kottak 1963; Kottak 1983).5 On the other hand, recent critics, both anthropological and psychological, argue that racial categories in Brazil are essentialized: they are dichotomous, rigid, and defined by descent (Gil-White 2001b; Sheriff 2001). Observing the coexistence of both ideologies in Belmonte and the active construction of supposedly natural categories by local actors led me to question both sides of this scholarly debate and to question the academic concept of race more generally&#8230;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Read\u00a0or\u00a0purchase the\u00a0article <a href=\"http:\/\/www.anthrosource.net\/standardtps.aspx?doi=10.1525\/eth.2007.35.3.383&amp;type=pdf\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u201cGirl, You Are Not Morena. We Are Negras!\u201d: Questioning the Concept of \u201cRace\u201d in Southern Bahia, Brazil Ethos Volume 35, Issue 3 (September 2007) pages 383-409 DOI: 10.1525\/eth.2007.35.3.383 Michael D. Baran, Preceptor in Expository Writing Harvard University In 2003, teachers at the municipal high school in Belmonte, Brazil, began presenting students with a radically different [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1649,12,83,21,125,8,394],"tags":[4090,4087,2652,4089,4088],"class_list":["post-9443","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-anthropology","category-articles","category-brazil","category-latincarib","category-identitydevelopment","category-media-archive","category-socialscience","tag-bahia","tag-ethos","tag-gilberto-freyre","tag-michael-baran","tag-michael-d-baran"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9443","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9443"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9443\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":50644,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9443\/revisions\/50644"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9443"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9443"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9443"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}