{"id":9910,"date":"2010-11-02T21:05:11","date_gmt":"2010-11-02T21:05:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mixedracestudies.org\/wordpress\/?p=9910"},"modified":"2014-12-24T17:41:44","modified_gmt":"2014-12-24T17:41:44","slug":"the-pocahontas-exception-the-exemption-of-american-indian-ancestry-from-racial-purity-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/?p=9910","title":{"rendered":"The Pocahontas Exception: The Exemption of American Indian Ancestry from Racial Purity Law"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><em><a href=\"http:\/\/law.bepress.com\/expresso\/eps\/1572\" target=\"_blank\">The Pocahontas Exception: The Exemption of American Indian Ancestry from Racial Purity Law<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/law.bepress.com\" target=\"_blank\">bepress Legal Series<br \/>\n<\/a>Working Paper 1572<br \/>\n2006-08-18<br \/>\n47 pages<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.noblemaillard.com\" target=\"_blank\">Kevin N. Maillard<\/a><\/strong>, Associate Professor of Law<br \/>\n<em>Syracuse University<\/em><\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Pocahontas Exception\u201d confronts the legal existence and cultural fascination with the eponymous \u201cIndian Grandmother.\u201d Laws existed in many states that prohibited marriage between whites and nonwhites to prevent the \u201cquagmire of mongrelization.\u201d Yet, this racial protectionism, as ingrained in law, blatantly exempted Indian blood from the threat to white racial purity. In <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Virginia\" target=\"_blank\">Virginia<\/a>, the<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Racial_Integrity_Act_of_1924\" target=\"_blank\"> Racial Integrity Act of 1924<\/a> made exceptions for whites of mixed descent who proudly claimed Native American ancestry from <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pocahontas\" target=\"_blank\">Pocahontas<\/a>. This paper questions the juridical exceptions made for Native American ancestry in antimiscegenation statues, and analyzes the concomitant exemptions in contemporary social practice. With increasing numbers of Americans freely and lately claiming Native ancestry, this openness escapes the triumvirate of resistance, shame, and secrecy that regularly accompanies findings of partial African ancestry. I contend that antimiscegenation laws such as the Racial Integrity Act relegate Indians to existence only in a distant past, creating a temporal disjuncture to free Indians from a contemporary discourse of racial politics. I argue that such exemptions assess Indians as abstractions rather than practicalities, which facilitates the miscegenistic exceptionalism as demonstrated in Virginia\u2019s antimiscegenation statute.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Table of Contents<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>I. INTRODUCTION<\/li>\n<li>II. ADVOCATING INDIAN-WHITE INTERMIXTURE\n<ul>\n<li>A. Support from the Founding Fathers<\/li>\n<li>B. Assimilation Schemes and the Dawes Allotment Act<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>III. EUGENICS AND THE RACIAL INTEGRITY ACT OF 1924\n<ul>\n<li>A. The Growth of the Eugenics Movement<\/li>\n<li>B. Fear Ingrained in Law: The Racial Integrity Act<\/li>\n<li>C. Accommodating the Elite: Redefining the Parameters of Whiteness<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>IV. THE LEGEND OF POCAHONTAS<\/li>\n<li>V. THE VANISHING INDIAN\n<ul>\n<li>A. The Indian Grandmother Complex: A Different Kind of Birth for the Nation<\/li>\n<li>B. To the Margins of Society: The Non-Threat of Indian Blood<\/li>\n<li>VI. CONCLUSION<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Read the entire article <a href=\"http:\/\/law.bepress.com\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=7237&amp;context=expresso\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Pocahontas Exception: The Exemption of American Indian Ancestry from Racial Purity Law bepress Legal Series Working Paper 1572 2006-08-18 47 pages Kevin N. Maillard, Associate Professor of Law Syracuse University \u201cThe Pocahontas Exception\u201d confronts the legal existence and cultural fascination with the eponymous \u201cIndian Grandmother.\u201d Laws existed in many states that prohibited marriage between [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,459,1467,8,3015,20],"tags":[4332,4330,4329,1234,4331],"class_list":["post-9910","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-articles","category-history","category-law","category-media-archive","category-native-americans","category-usa","tag-bepress-legal-series","tag-kevin-maillard","tag-kevin-n-maillard","tag-kevin-noble-maillard","tag-pocahontas"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9910","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9910"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9910\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9910"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9910"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mixedracestudies.org\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9910"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}