Centre for Health Services Studies (CHSS)
University of Kent at Canterbury
July 2006
Peter Aspinall, Senior Research Fellow
Centre for Health Services Studies (CHSS)
University of Kent
Miri Song, Professor of Sociology
University of Kent
Ferhana Hashem, Research Fellow
Centre for Health Services Studies (CHSS)
University of Kent
…This research project into the preferences for terminology and classifications was initiated in 2004 and put into the field in summer 2005. Its main purposes were: (i) to help inform terminology and classifications for ethnic group for the upcoming 2011 Census and (ii) to serve as a pilot study for an ESRC application: ‘The ethnic options of mixed race people in Britain’ (which also had a focus on official terminology and classifications). This application was funded by ESRC and the project began on 1st March 2006. A small dataset on official terminology and classifications is also accruing via this route…
…On issues of terminology, the salient general term of choice amongst respondents was ‘mixed race’. The only other terms that attracted significant support were ‘mixed heritage’ and ‘mixed parentage’. Very few preferred ‘dual heritage’. Respondents identified eleven different terms as offensive, most frequently ‘dual heritage’, ‘half-caste’ and ‘mixed origins’. The reasons for the dislike of ‘dual heritage’ focussed mainly on its limitation to two groups. ‘Half-caste’ was regarded as pejorative by several respondents, on the ground of partial recognition & historical connotations. The largest number of respondents felt that terms like ‘mixed race’ and ‘mixed parentage’ should refer to ‘people who are mixes of white and any minority racial/ethnic group’. Significant numbers also felt that the terms should refer to people who are mixes of minority racial/ethnic groups, people who are mixes of white and black groups only, and people of disparate ethnic origins…
Read the entire report here.