Mixed Race Studies

Scholarly perspectives on the mixed race experience.

    • About This Site
    • Bibliography
    • Contact Information
    • Date and Time Formats
    • Forthcoming… (Updated 2021-09-01)
    • Likely Asked Questions
    • List of Book Publishers
    • List of Definitions and Terms
    • My Favorite Articles and Papers
    • My Favorite Posts
    • My Recent Activities
    • Praise for Mixed Race Studies
    • Tag Listing
      • Tag Listing (Ordered by Count)
    • US Census Race Categories, 1790-2010
    • 1661: The First ‘Mixed-Race’ Milestone
    • 2010 U.S. Census – Some Thoughts

recent posts

  • The Routledge International Handbook of Interracial and Intercultural Relationships and Mental Health
  • Loving Across Racial and Cultural Boundaries: Interracial and Intercultural Relationships and Mental Health Conference
  • Call for Proposals: 2026 Critical Mixed Race Studies Conference at UCLA
  • Participants Needed for a Paid Research Study: Up to $100
  • You were either Black or white. To claim whiteness as a mixed child was to deny and hide Blackness. Our families understood that the world we were growing into would seek to denigrate this part of us and we would need a community that was made up, always and already, of all shades of Blackness.

about

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Emil Guillermo: Rachel Dolezal, Dylann Roof, and Father’s Day

    2015-06-21

    Emil Guillermo: Rachel Dolezal, Dylann Roof, and Father’s Day

    Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund
    2015-06-20

    Emil Guillermo

    Rachel Dolezal nearly wrecked everyone’s Father’s Day.

    You don’t often see a daughter outed so publicly by her white father for passing as an African American, but I guess post-racial filial love isn’t necessarily unconditional.

    I admit to being somewhat sympathetic of Rachel D., at first. The Census, our demographic standard, is, after all, a “you are what you say you are” proposition. You can self-identify to your heart’s content. No one is going to enforce a “one drop rule,” like they did in Virginia for hundreds of years to keep marriage a segregated institution.

    But Dolezal’s “no drop” rule can also be problematic. And when her family’s outing her became like a reality show audition, leave it to the black man whom she called dad, Albert Wilkerson, to bring things back to earth. “There are bigger issues in this country to be discussing,” he told People magazine. “[But] I’m not going to throw her under the bus.”

    Now that’s the kind of love you’ll only find from a real, though fake, “Dad.”…

    Read the entire article here.

  • Charleston and the Age of Obama

    2015-06-21

    Charleston and the Age of Obama

    The New Yorker
    2015-06-19

    David Remnick, Editor

    Between 1882 and 1968, the year Martin Luther King, Jr., was assassinated, three thousand four hundred and forty-six black men, women, and children were lynched in this country—a practice so vicious and frequent that Mark Twain was moved, in 1901, to write an essay called “The United States of Lyncherdom.” (Twain shelved the essay and plans for a full-length book on lynching because, he told his publisher, if he went forward, “I shouldn’t have even half a friend left down [South].”) These thousands of murders, as studied by the Tuskegee Institute and others, were a means of enforcing white supremacy in the political and economic marketplaces; they served to terrorize black men who might dare to sleep, or even talk, with white women, and to silence black children, like Emmett Till, who were deemed “insolent.”

    That legacy of extreme cruelty and unpunished murder as a means of exerting political and physical control of African-Americans cannot be far from our minds right now. Nine people were shot dead in a church in Charleston. How is it possible, while reading about the alleged killer, Dylann Storm Roof, posing darkly in a picture on his Facebook page, the flags of racist Rhodesia and apartheid South Africa sewn to his jacket, not to think that we have witnessed a lynching? Roof, it is true, did not brandish a noose, nor was he backed by a howling mob of Klansmen, as was so often the case in the heyday of American lynching. Subsequent investigation may put at least some of the blame for his actions on one form of derangement or another. And yet the apparent sense of calculation and planning, what a witness reportedly said was the shooter’s statement of purpose in the Emanuel A.M.E. Church as he took up his gun—“You rape our women and you’re taking over our country”—echoed some of the very same racial anxieties, resentments, and hatreds that fuelled the lynchings of an earlier time.

    But the words attributed to the shooter are both a throwback and thoroughly contemporary: one recognizes the rhetoric of extreme reaction and racism heard so often in the era of Barack Obama. His language echoed the barely veiled epithets hurled at Obama in the 2008 and 2012 campaigns (“We want our country back!”) and the raw sewage that spewed onto Obama’s Twitter feed (@POTUS) the moment he cheerfully signed on last month. “We still hang for treason don’t we?” one @jeffgully49, who also posted an image of the President in a noose, wrote…

    …Obama hates to talk about this. He allows himself so little latitude. Maybe that will change when he is an ex-President focussed on his memoirs. As a very young man he wrote a book about becoming, about identity, about finding community in a black church, about finding a sense of home—in his case, on the South Side of Chicago, with a young lawyer named Michelle Robinson…

    Read the entire article here.

  • ‘Lightskin Guys Be Like…’

    2015-06-21

    ‘Lightskin Guys Be Like…’

    BlogbyBilal: Living in NW London my whole life until I was whisked away by magic pumpkin chariot into Cambridge for the fairy tale years of my life – my ramblings of my tour of the North.
    2015-06-18

    Bilal Harry Khan

    “Lightskin boys be so moist”

    “Those guys are bare in their feelings”

    “Drake behaviour”

    I was standing in this Jamaican takeaway place the other day in Willesden (Curry Goat, Rice & Peas and one niiiice dumpling if you were wondering, and let’s be real, you’re now salivating) when the woman who was serving me, I say serving but she had gone off into the kitchen, quite casually turned to her co-worker and said ‘The Lightskin bwoy did order di dumpling deh, pass him it nuh’.(If you’re slightly lost with the translation, then all I can really recommend is you phone a friend.) ‘Lightskin Boy.’ I thought to myself. As I stood there looking at the back of my own beige hands having a moment that I can only liken to that bit in Lion King where Simba stares into the murky pond in the jungle with Rafiki telling him to ‘Look deeper’ the woman was back, shoving my food into my hand and so I walked off. Wandering along the street, now even more hungry because the food was within a minute away from being eaten (why does that always happen!?) I found myself quite lost thinking about the many times in the last 23 and whatnot years I’ve been referred to by my complexion, and it got me thinking, why? Why is it that I’m called a Lightskin Boy? What is even tied up in the meaning of this delineation, and indeed – what does society in Britain today think about males of a lighter complexion?

    Often I hear it or, rather, see it thrown around on the TimeLine in memes, ‘banter’ etc. that Black or Mixed-Race men of a lighter complexion are in some way ‘less masculine’ than those society has termed ‘darkskinned’ – indeed something which begs me to ask what being ‘masculine’ even means today! So it got me thinking, what do other people think about this? I mean surely there’s a point where things stop being banter and start having real-world effects, so I thought I’d ask a few people what they thought, and it’s their words that shape this next bit of writing and hopefully, our understanding moving forwards…

    Read the entire article here.

  • Census considers new approach to asking about race – by not using the term at all

    2015-06-21

    Census considers new approach to asking about race – by not using the term at all

    Pew Research Center
    2015-06-18

    D’Vera Cohn, Senior Writer/Editor


    Possible 2020 census race/Hispanic question for online respondents, who would click to the next screen to choose more detailed sub-categories such as “Cuban” or “Chinese.” Credit: U.S. Census Bureau

    The Census Bureau is experimenting with new ways to ask Americans about their race or origin in the 2020 census – including not using the words “race” or “origin” at all. Instead, the questionnaire may tell people to check the “categories” that describe them.

    Census officials say they want the questions they ask to be clear and easy, in order to encourage Americans to answer them, so the officials can better collect race and Hispanic data as required by law. But many people are confused by the current wording, or find it misleading or insufficient to describe their identity.

    Census forms now have two questions about race and Hispanic origin. The first asks people whether they are of Hispanic, Latino or Spanish origin, and states that “Hispanic origins are not races.” A second question asks, “What is this person’s race?” and includes a list of options with checkboxes and write-in spaces. The U.S. government defines Hispanic as an ethnicity, not a race.

    The problem with using the word “race” is that many Americans say they don’t know what it means, and how it is different from “origin.” The agency’s focus group research found that some people think the words mean the same thing, while others see race as meaning skin color, ancestry or culture, while origin is the nation or place where they or their parents were born…

    …The content test also will experiment with adding a new Middle East and North Africa category. The test represents the bureau’s final major research effort before locking down its proposed 2020 questionnaire wording…

    …“I’m very happy that they are going to test a question which gets away from the language of race and ethnicity because frankly that is just a quagmire, that language,” said Ann Morning, an advisory committee member and New York University race scholar. “No two people seem to be able to agree on what those terms mean.”

    In follow-up comments in an email, Morning said she believes “the beauty of simply referring to ‘categories’ is that it avoids that problem of people getting hung up on the terminology. So I would expect this term will allow people to answer the question more quickly, and to feel more free to check more than one box if they wish, and to lead to a lower non-response rate on that question.”…

    Read the entire article here.

  • “Empathy does not preclude accountability:” Jay Smooth on Rachel Dolezal

    2015-06-19

    “Empathy does not preclude accountability:” Jay Smooth on Rachel Dolezal

    Fusion
    2015-06-18

    Jay Smooth

    Last night, while I was in the midst of making a video on the Rachel Dolezal situation, the news broke of this horrific racist killing in Charleston South Carolina. After much deliberation we have decided to release the video as scheduled, and I believe its core message is still relevant to the moment. But please know my whole heart is with the people of Charleston, Emanuel AME Church, and everyone affected by this wholly unthinkable yet all too American act of terrorism.

    Watch the video here.

  • Rachel Dolezal’s Story Sparks Questions About ‘How People Experience Race’

    2015-06-18

    Rachel Dolezal’s Story Sparks Questions About ‘How People Experience Race’

    All Things Considered
    National Public Radio
    2015-06-16

    Audie Cornish, Host

    Khadijah White, Assistant Professor of Journalism and Media Studies
    Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

    Allyson Hobbs, Assistant Professor of History
    Stanford University

    NPR’s Audie Cornish talks with Rutgers University professor Khadijah White and Allyson Hobbs, who wrote a book about the history of racial passing, about the former head of the NAACP in Spokane, Wash.

    Listen to the story here. Download the story here. Read the transcript here.

  • Study illuminates why multiracial Americans almost never call themselves white

    2015-06-18

    Study illuminates why multiracial Americans almost never call themselves white

    Vox
    2015-06-15

    Jenée Desmond-Harris

    Look up any article about President Obama that focuses on his role as the first black president.

    Go ahead, do it now.

    Scroll down to the comments.

    I promise you, you’ll find earnest inquiries asking why the president is considered black or biracial when his mother is white. You’ll find people who are sincerely saddened by the idea that he would “reject” her contribution to his heritage. You’ll find people who are legitimately confused about why half black plus half white sometimes equals black and sometimes equals biracial, but rarely if ever seems to equal white…

    …This is why multiracial people don’t normally identify as white

    A new study by Pew Research Center takes a comprehensive look at the experiences of multiracial Americans.  Using a different approach than the census by taking into account people’s parents’ and grandparents’ racial backgrounds in addition to their self-reported race, it concluded that multiracial adults currently make up 6.9 percent of the adult American population.

    One of its many findings has to do with multiracial identity, and that age-old question of why mixed-race Americans like Obama and so many others don’t seem to give their white parents’ ethnicity the same weight as their other heritage when it comes to self-description…

    The study revealed that people who identify as multiracial say they experience discrimination based on the part of their heritage that is not white. Here’s how Pew explained it in the write-up (emphasis added):

    For multiracial adults with a black background, experiences with discrimination closely mirror those of single-race blacks. Among adults who are black and no other race, 57% say they have received poor service in restaurants or other businesses, identical to the share of biracial black and white adults who say this has happened to them; and 42% of single-race blacks say they have been unfairly stopped by the police, as do 41% of biracial black and white adults. Mixed-race adults with an Asian background are about as likely to report being discriminated against as are single-race Asians, while multiracial adults with a white background are more likely than single-race whites to say they have experienced racial discrimination.

    This echoes the way Obama has explained why he calls himself black. “I’m not sure I decided it,” he once said in an interview with 60 Minutes. “I think, you know, if you look African-American in this society, you’re treated as an African-American.”

    He later told PBS, “If I’m outside your building trying to catch a cab, they’re not saying, ‘Oh, there’s a mixed-race guy.’”…

    Read the entire article here.

  • One Drop of Love: Written and Performed by: Fanshen Cox DiGiovanni

    2015-06-18

    One Drop of Love: Written and Performed by: Fanshen Cox DiGiovanni

    2015 TCG National Conference
    Theatre Communications Group
    Westfield Insurance Studio Theatre, IDEA Center
    1375 Euclid Avenue
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Friday, 2015-06-19, 20:00 EDT (Local Time)

    Produced by Ben Affleck, Matt Damon and Fanshen Cox DiGiovanni, this extraordinary one-woman show incorporates filmed images, photographs and animation to tell the story of how the notion of ‘race’ came to be in the United States and how it affects Cox DiGiovanni’s relationship with her father. A moving memoir, One Drop takes audiences from the 1700s to the present, to cities all over the U.S. and to West and East Africa, where both father and daughter spent time in search of their ‘racial’ roots. The ultimate goal of the show is to encourage everyone to discuss ‘race’ and racism openly and critically. Watch the trailer here. The performance will be followed by a brief discussion with Ms. DiGiovanni.

    For more information, click here.

  • As Rachel Dolezal Breaks Silence, a Roundtable Discussion on Race, Appropriation and Identity

    2015-06-18

    As Rachel Dolezal Breaks Silence, a Roundtable Discussion on Race, Appropriation and Identity

    Democracy Now: A Daily Independent Global News Hour
    Wednesday, 2015-06-17

    Amy Goodman, Host and Executive Producer

    Juan González, Co-Host

    Stacey Patton, Senior Enterprise Reporter
    The Chronicle of Higher Education

    Lacey Schwartz, Chief Executive Officer
    Truth Aid (also Producer/director of the documentary film “Little White Lie”)

    Linda Martín Alcoff, Professor of Philosophy
    Hunter College, City University of New York

    Jelani Cobb, Associate Professor of History; Director of the Africana Studies Institute
    University of Connecticut

    We look at the growing national debate over racial identity sparked by the story of Rachel Dolezal. A Washington state civil rights advocate and educator, Dolezal resigned her post as president of the Spokane chapter of the NAACP on Monday amid reports she falsely identified as black. The controversy began when Dolezal’s parents told reporters their daughter is white, and shared photographs of her as a child. On Tuesday, Dolezal broke her silence, saying she has identified as black since a young age.

    Download the episode here.

  • We cannot shed our skin, nor our privileges like an outdated overcoat. They are not accessories to be donned or not as one pleases, but rather, persistent reminders of the society that is not yet real, which is why we must work with people of color to overturn the system that bestows those privileges.

    2015-06-17

    There is a lesson here for us, for we who are white and care deeply about racial equity, justice and liberation, and the lesson is this: authentic antiracist white identity is what we must cultivate. We cannot shed our skin, nor our privileges like an outdated overcoat. They are not accessories to be donned or not as one pleases, but rather, persistent reminders of the society that is not yet real, which is why we must work with people of color to overturn the system that bestows those privileges. But the key word here is with people of color, not as them. We must be willing to do the difficult work of finding a different way to live in this skin.

    Tim Wise, “Mimicry is Not Solidarity: Of Allies, Rachel Dolezal and the Creation of Antiracist White Identity,” Tim Wise: Antiracist Essayist, Author and Educator, June 14, 2015. http://www.timwise.org/2015/06/mimicry-is-not-solidarity-of-allies-rachel-dolezal-and-the-creation-of-antiracist-white-identity.

Previous Page
1 … 584 585 586 587 588 … 1,428
Next Page

Designed with WordPress