Prisoners of Abstraction? The Theory and Measure of Genetic Variation, and the Very Concept of “Race”Posted in Articles, Health/Medicine/Genetics, Media Archive, Philosophy on 2013-02-16 16:46Z by Steven |
Biological Theory
July 2012
12 pages
DOI: 10.1007/s13752-012-0048-0
Jonathan Michael Kaplan, Associate Professor of Philosophy
Oregon State University
Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther, Assistant Professor of Philosophy
University of California, Santa Cruz
It is illegitimate to read any ontology about “race” off of biological theory or data. Indeed, the technical meaning of “genetic variation” is fluid, and there is no single theoretical agreed-upon criterion for defining and distinguishing populations given a particular set of genetic variation data. By analyzing three formal senses of “genetic variation,” viz., diversity, differentiation, and heterozygosity, we argue that the use of biological theory for making claims about race inevitably amounts to a pernicious reification. Biological theory does not force the concept of “race” upon us; our social discourse, social ontology, and social expectations do. We become prisoners of our abstractions at our own hands, and at our own expense.
Read the entire article here.