Inconsistency within Expressed and Observed Racial Identifications: Implications for Mental Health StatusPosted in Articles, Health/Medicine/Genetics, Identity Development/Psychology, Media Archive, Social Science, United States on 2015-08-30 02:32Z by Steven |
Sociological Perspectives
Published online before print 2015-08-29
DOI: 10.1177/0731121415602133
Whitney N. Laster Pirtle, Assistant Professor of Sociology
University of California, Merced
Tony N. Brown, Associate Professor of Sociology
Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
The present study extends previous work on distress that arises from discrepancy between self and interviewer racial identifications. Using the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health) data, we examine mental health consequences of inconsistency over time within expressed (self) and observed (interviewer) racial identifications among American Indians. Given that phenotype signals race, we also contribute to prior research by examining whether skin color moderates inconsistency’s mental health consequences. Analyses show that observed racial inconsistency increased American Indians’ depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation. That is, when interviewers labeled a respondent “American Indian” at one wave of data but not another, there were deleterious implications for mental health status. In addition, an interaction between observed inconsistency and skin color demonstrated that observed inconsistency tended to be harmful when respondents were observed as having light skin. We argue observed inconsistency captures the distressing experience of being not readily classifiable.
Read or purchase the article here.