The meaning and measurement of race in the U.S. census: Glimpses into the futurePosted in Articles, Census/Demographics, Media Archive, Social Science, United States on 2012-01-09 05:30Z by Steven |
The meaning and measurement of race in the U.S. census: Glimpses into the future
Demography
Volume 37, Number 3 (August 2000)
pages 381-393
DOI: 10.2307/2648049
Charles Hirschman, Boeing International Professor of Sociology and Professor of Public Affaris
University of Washington
Richard Alba, Distinguished Professor (Emeritus) of Sociology
Co-Director of The Center for the Elimination of Minority Health Disparities
State University of New York, Albany
Reynolds Farley, Research Professor Emeritus
University of Michigan
Population Studies Center at the Institute for Social Research
The 1996 Racial and Ethnic Targeted Test (RAETT) was a “mail-out mail-back” household survey with an experimental design of eight alternative questionnaire formats containing systematic variations in race, instructions, question order, and other aspects of the measurement. The eight different questionnaires were administered to random subsamples of six “targeted” populations: geographic areas with ethnic concentrations of whites, blacks, American Indians, Alaskan natives, Asian and Pacific Islanders, and Hispanics. The major conclusion is that allowing multiple responses to the “race” question in the 2000 census (and other variations in measurement that were considered in RAETT) had only a slight impact on the measured racial composition of the population. Another finding was a dramatic reduction in nonresponse to the combined race/Hispanic-origin question relative to all other questionnaire formats. We conclude that the concept of “origins” may be closer to the popular understanding of American diversity than is the antiquated concept of race.
Read the entire article here.