• Auschwitz to Rwanda: The link between science, colonialism and genocide

    Mail & Guardian Africa
    Johannesburg, South Africa
    2017-02-01

    Heike Becker


    Sixty years later, the recurrent connections of science and genocide still demonstrate the dark underbelly of Western modernity in Africa, Europe, and the world. (Reuters/Finbarr O’Reilly)

    Significant links connect racial science in colonial southern Africa with the holocaust of the European Jews.

    When the Soviet army liberated the Auschwitz death camp on January 27 1945, among the prisoners left behind were a number of young twins. The surviving children and many more who had died were the subject of disturbing human experiments by Josef Mengele, a physician known as the “Angel of Death”.

    About 3 000 twins were selected from an estimated 1.3-million people who arrived at Auschwitz for Mengele’s deadly “scientific” experiments. Only about 200 of them survived.

    Mengele is significant for understanding the complicity of science with the mass atrocities of the 20th century. The elegant young doctor defied the stereotypical image of the Nazi brute. He was no crazy drunken beast with a whip. This was an ambitious researcher of human genetics, holding doctorates in anthropology and medicine.

    Mengele worked in Auschwitz from May 1943. The death camp presented him with a “perfect” laboratory. It provided an unlimited supply of human specimens to study genetics, and he wouldn’t get into trouble if they died following lethal injections and other gruesome experiments.

    Nazis and colonial ‘racial science’

    The institute’s first director in 1927 was the well-known physical anthropologist Eugen Fischer. Fischer was a prolific researcher who had earned his scientific merits in genetics and racial science in the then German colony of German South West Africa (today’s Namibia).

    His 1908 field study, published in 1913, focused on the effects of racial mixing (“miscegenation”), applying the genetic theory of Gregor Mendel. Fischer examined 310 children of the “Basters” of Rehoboth, a community of “mixed-race” people living to the South of Windhoek in Namibia.

    The Rehobother offspring of Nama women and white men were observed and subjected to physical measurements. Based on these “scientific” methods, Fischer classified the mixed-race population.

    His verdict that African blood imparted impurity resulted in the prohibition of mixed-race marriages in all German colonies by 1912. In Namibia interracial marriage was already prohibited in 1905.

    German colonialism ended after World War I. This, however, was not the end of racial science. Incubated in the colonial laboratories of southern Africa, it was brought back and applied in “civilised” central Europe. Fischer first followed up his “bastard studies” in the 1920s and early 1930s with the “Rhineland bastards”, children born to German mothers and fathers from the French African colonies. Few black Germans perished during the Nazi era. But, many were forcibly sterilised.

    The story of the KWI-A demonstrates how several significant dimensions connect 20th century racial science, colonialism and genocide…

    Read the entire article here.

  • On the Precipice of a “Majority-Minority” America: Perceived Status Threat From the Racial Demographic Shift Affects White Americans’ Political Ideology

    Psychological Science
    Volume 25, Issue 6 (2014-06-01)
    pages 1189-1197
    DOI: 10.1177/0956797614527113

    Maureen A. Craig, Assistant Professor of Psychology
    New York University

    Jennifer A. Richeson, Philip R. Allen Professor of Psychology
    Yale University

    The U.S. Census Bureau projects that racial minority groups will make up a majority of the U.S. national population in 2042, effectively creating a so-called majority-minority nation. In four experiments, we explored how salience of such racial demographic shifts affects White Americans’ political-party leanings and expressed political ideology. Study 1 revealed that making California’s majority-minority shift salient led politically unaffiliated White Americans to lean more toward the Republican Party and express greater political conservatism. Studies 2, 3a, and 3b revealed that making the changing national racial demographics salient led White Americans (regardless of political affiliation) to endorse conservative policy positions more strongly. Moreover, the results implicate group-status threat as the mechanism underlying these effects. Taken together, this work suggests that the increasing diversity of the nation may engender a widening partisan divide.

    Read the entire article here.

  • Unmaking Race and Ethnicity: A Reader

    Oxford University Press
    2016-07-20
    512 Pages
    7-1/2 x 9-1/4 inches
    Paperback ISBN: 9780190202712

    Edited by:

    Michael O. Emerson, Provost and Professor of Sociology
    North Park University
    also Senior Fellow at Rice University’s Kinder Institute for Urban Research

    Jenifer L. Bratter, Associate Professor of Sociology; Director of the Program for the Study of Ethnicity, Race, and Culture at the Kinder Institute for Urban Research
    Rice University, Houston, Texas

    Sergio Chávez, Assistant Professor of Sociology
    Rice University, Houston, Texas

    Race and ethnicity is a contentious topic that presents complex problems with no easy solutions. (Un)Making Race and Ethnicity: A Reader, edited by Michael O. Emerson, Jenifer L. Bratter, and Sergio Chávez, helps instructors and students connect with primary texts in ways that are informative and interesting, leading to engaging discussions and interactions. With more than thirty collective years of teaching experience and research in race and ethnicity, the editors have chosen selections that will encourage students to think about possible solutions to solving the problem of racial inequality in our society. Featuring global readings throughout, (Un)Making Race and Ethnicity covers both race and ethnicity, demonstrating how they are different and how they are related. It includes a section dedicated to unmaking racial and ethnic orders and explains challenging concepts, terms, and references to enhance student learning.

    Table of Contents

    • Preface
    • UNIT I. Core Concepts and Foundations
      • What Is Race? What Is Ethnicity? What Is the Difference?
        • Introduction, Irina Chukhray and Jenifer Bratter
        • 1. Constructing Ethnicity: Creating and Recreating Ethnic Identity and Culture, Joane Nagel
        • 2. The Racialization of Kurdish Identity in Turkey, Murat Ergin
        • 3. Who Counts as “Them?”: Racism and Virtue in the United States and France, Michèle Lamont
        • 4. Mexican Immigrant Replenishment and the Continuing Significance of Ethnicity and Race, Tomás R. Jiménez
      • Why Race Matters
        • Introduction, Laura Essenburg and Jenifer Bratter
        • 5. Excerpt from Racial Formation in the United States From the 1960s to the 1990s, Michael Omi and Howard Winant
        • 6. Structural and Cultural Forces that Contribute to Racial Inequality, William Julius Wilson
        • 7. From Traditional to Liberal Racism: Living Racism in the Everyday, Margaret M. Zamudio and Francisco Rios
        • 8. Policing and Racialization of Rural Migrant Workers in Chinese Cities, Dong Han
        • 9. Why Group Membership Matters: A Critical Typology, Suzy Killmister
      • What Is Racism? Does Talking about Race and Ethnicity Make Things Worse?
        • Introduction, Laura Essenburg and Jenifer Bratter
        • 10. What Is Racial Domination?, Matthew Desmond and Mustafa Emirbayer
        • 11. Discursive Colorlines at Work: How Epithets and Stereotypes are Racially Unequal, David G. Embrick and Kasey Henricks
        • 12. When Ideology Clashes with Reality: Racial Discrimination and Black Identity in Contemporary Cuba, Danielle P. Clealand
        • 13. Raceblindness in Mexico: Implications for Teacher Education in the United States, Christina A. Sue
    • UNIT II. Roots: Making Race and Ethnicity
      • Origins of Race and Ethnicity
        • Introduction, Adriana Garcia and Michael Emerson
        • 14. Antecedents of the Racial Worldview, Audrey Smedley and Brian Smedley
        • 15. Building the Racist Foundation: Colonialism, Genocide, and Slavery, Joe R. Feagin
        • 16. The Racialization of the Globe: An Interactive Interpretation, Frank Dikötter
      • Migrations
        • Introduction, Sandra Alvear
        • 17. Excerpt from Becoming Mexican American: Ethnicity, Culture, and Identity in Chicano Los Angeles, 1900-1945, George J. Sánchez
        • 18. Migration to Europe since 1945: Its History and Its Lessons, Randall Hansen
        • 19. When Identities Become Modern: Japanese Emigration to Brazil and the Global Contextualization of Identity, Takeyuki (Gaku) Tsuda
      • Ideologies
        • Introduction, Junia Howell
        • 20. Excerpt from Racism: A Short History, George M. Fredrickson
        • 21. Understanding Latin American Beliefs about Racial Inequality, Edward Telles and Stanley Bailey
        • 22. Buried Alive: The Concept of Race in Science, Troy Duster
    • Unit III. Today: Remaking Race and Ethnicity
      • Aren’t We All Just Human? How Race and Ethnicity Help Us Answer the Question
        • Introduction, Adriana Garcia
        • 23. Young Children Learning Racial and Ethnic Matters, Debra Van Ausdale and Joe R. Feagin
        • 24. When White Is Just Alright: How Immigrants Redefine Achievement and Reconfigure the Ethnoracial Hierarchy, Tomás R. Jiménez and Adam L. Horowitz
        • 25. From Bi-Racial to Tri-Racial: Towards a New System of Racial Stratification in the USA, Eduardo Bonilla-Silva
        • 26. Indigenism, Mestizaje, and National Identity in Mexico during the 1940s and the 1950s, Anne Doremus
      • The Company You Keep: How Ethnicity and Race Frame Social Relationships
        • Introduction, William Rothwell
        • 27. Who We’ll Live With: Neighborhood Racial Composition Preferences of Whites, Blacks and Latinos, Valerie A. Lewis, Michael O. Emerson, and Stephen L. Klineberg
        • 28. The Costs of Diversity in Religious Organizations: An In-Depth Case Study, Brad Christerson and Michael O. Emerson
      • The Uneven Playing Field: How Race and Ethnicity Impact Life Chances
        • Introduction, Ellen Whitehead and Jenifer Bratter
        • 29. Wealth in the Extended Family: An American Dilemma, Ngina S. Chiteji
        • 30. The Complexities and Processes of Racial Housing Discrimination, Vincent J. Roscigno, Diana L. Karafin, and Griff Tester
        • 31. Racial Segregation and the Black/White Achievement Gap, 1992 to 2009, Dennis J. Condron, Daniel Tope, Christina R. Steidl, and Kendralin J. Freeman
        • 32. Differential Vulnerabilities: Environmental and Economic Inequality and Government Response to Unnatural Disasters, Robert D. Bullard
        • 33. Racialized Mass Incarceration: Poverty, Prejudice, and Punishment, Lawrence D. Bobo and Victor Thompson
    • Unit IV. Unmaking Race and Ethnicity
      • Thinking Strategically
        • Introduction, Junia Howell and Michael Emerson
        • 34. The Return of Assimilation? Changing Perspectives on Immigration and Its Sequels in France, Germany, and the United States, Rogers Brubaker
        • 35. Toward a Truly Multiracial Democracy: Thinking and Acting Outside the White Frame, Joe R. Feagin
        • 36. Destabilizing the American Racial Order, Jennifer Hochschild, Vesla Weaver, and Traci Burch
      • Altering Individuals and Relationships
        • Introduction, Horace Duffy and Jenifer Bratter
        • 37. A More Perfect Union, Barack Obama
        • 38. What Can Be Done?, Debra Van Ausdale and Joe R. Feagin
        • 39. The Multiple Dimensions of Racial Mixture in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: From Whitening to Brazilian Negritude, Graziella Moraes da Silva and Elisa P. Reis
      • Altering Structures
        • Introduction, Kevin T. Smiley and Jenifer Bratter
        • 40. The Case for Reparations, Ta-Nehisi Coates
        • 41. “Undocumented and Citizen Students Unite”: Building a Cross-Status Coalition Through Shared Ideology, Laura E. Enriquez
        • 42. Racial Solutions for a New Society, Michael Emerson and George Yancey
        • 43. DREAM Act College: UCLA Professors Create National Diversity University, Online School for Undocumented Immigrants, Alyssa Creamer
    • Glossary
    • Credits
  • The white supremacy of being asked where I’m from

    PBS NewsHour
    2017-01-27

    What comes to mind when you hear the phrase “white supremacy”? For actor comedian Peter Kim, it’s facing the commonplace cultural assumption that white is the default race in America

    ANTONIO MORA: Finally tonight, a look at the subtle ways our society often equates being white with what’s normal.

    It comes from Peter Kim, who was a member of Chicago’s famed Second City comedy troupe.

    It is the latest edition of IMHO, In My Humble Opinion.

    PETER KIM, Comedian: When you hear the phrase white supremacy, what picture comes to your mind? Maybe it’s Adolf Hitler screaming into a microphone. Maybe it’s white-hooded figures marching around a burning cross.

    For me, it’s a lot less dramatic and a lot more commonplace. So, if I may, I would like to offer an updated definition of white supremacy. It’s the idea that white is the ideal, and we are all consciously and subconsciously working to achieve whiteness…

    Read the entire transcipt here.

  • Construction of Race and Class Buffers in the Structure of Immigration Controls and Laws

    Oregon Law Review
    Volume 76 (1997)
    pages 731-764

    Tanya Katerí Hernández, Professor of Law
    Fordham University

    In the midst of current anti-immigration sentiment, which is motivating dramatic changes in the United States immigration laws, there exists the myth that prior immigration laws were more equitable and humanitarian. Yet historical analysis reveals that immigration law has been put to uses far from idyllic, and has always been concerned with the racial makeup of the nation. Specifically, national preoccupation with the maintenance of a “White country” is reflected in immigration law. The continued national preference for White immigrants is explicitly featured in the visa profiling codes of U.S. embassies and consulates. This Essay employs a race-conscious lens to analyze the way in which immigration law has been structured to perpetuate a racial hierarchy which privileges Whiteness, primarily by preferring White immigrants to immigrants of color, and secondarily by drafting immigrants of color to form a middle-tier buffer and, alternatively, to provide a bottom-tier surplus labor supply.

    Read the entire article here.

  • Why white liberals need to figure out how to talk about race

    KUOW.org: 94.9 FM, Seattle News & Information
    2017-01-06

    By Katherine Banwell & Jamala Henderson


    Professor Ralina Joseph at the University of Washington says to just start talking about race.
    University of Washington

    Why is race so hard to discuss? Ralina Joseph, founding director of the University of Washington’s Center for Communication, Difference, and Equity, talked about coded racial language, from Seattle liberals to Trump. This is a transcript from her interview, lightly edited for clarity…

    Listen to the interview (00:04:12) here.

  • The (Un)Happy Objects of Affective Community

    Cultural Studies
    Volume 30, Issue 1 (2016)
    pages 24-46
    DOI: 10.1080/09502386.2014.899608

    Alexandre Emboaba Da Costa, Assistant Professor, Theoretical, Cultural and International Studies in Education
    University of Alberta, Canada

    Affect permeates understandings of racial and cultural mixture as well as racial democracy in Brazil. Sentiments of interconnectedness, harmony and conviviality shape the ways in which Brazilians of diverse races/colours feel identity and belonging. These sentiments also drive hopeful attachments to possibilities for moving beyond race, influencing how people encounter and relate to racism and inequality. However, studies of race in Brazil tend to either take the affective for granted as positive unifying force or ignore its role in shaping the appeal of dominant racial discourses on identity, nation and belonging. Through an examination of the different ways people feel, experience and live orientations towards mixture and racial democracy as the dominant affective community, this paper analyzes the role the affective plays in constituting racial ideologies and shaping anti-racist action. I explore the ways histories of race, racism, privilege and disadvantage generate unequal attachments to and experiences of mixture and racial democracy as what Sara Ahmed calls ‘happy objects’, those objects towards which good feeling are directed, that provide a shared horizon of experience, and that shape an affective community with which all are assumed to be aligned. Not everyone attaches themselves to the same objects in the same way and for the same reasons – the affective community involves positive, hopeful attachments for some and an unhappy, alienating and unequally shared burden for others. These affective states demonstrate that histories of race and racism cannot be wished away through commonly asserted attachments to abstract ideals of shared belonging. At the same time, examining these affective states provides deeper understanding of the ways unequal attachments move people towards action or inaction in relation to race, racism and discrimination.

    Read or purchase the article here.

  • The ‘Failed’ Project of Blackness in Contemporary Afro-Puerto Rican Discourse

    A Contra corriente: A Journal on Social History and Literature in Latin America
    Volume 5, Number 3, Spring 2008
    pages 243-251

    Sonja Stephenson Watson, Director of the Women’s & Gender Studies Program; Associate Professor of Spanish
    University of Texas, Arlington

    Escritura afropuertorriqueña y modernidad (2007), by Eleuterio Santiago-Díaz, is an insightful critical work on contemporary afropuertorican discourse with an emphasis on the writings of Carmelo Rodríguez Torres. The work commences by situating Puerto Rico in the “Black Atlantic,” that is, the greater African Diaspora. Ironically, Santiago-Díaz begins and ends his study noting that his research on Afro-Puerto Rico and Rodríguez Torres is simultaneously an affirmation and a negation of black identity because it counters official discourses of racial homogeneity during the island’s nation-building period which posited blackness over whiteness. This racial oppression and suppression of blackness stems from early twentieth-century (1930s and 1940s) Puerto Rican national discourse which erased blackness from the national imaginary and contributed to the failed black project of modernity. Thus, Santiago-Díaz argues that afropuertorican discourse is a failed modern project stemming from Antonio de Nebrija’s seminal text Gramática castellana (1492) and the literary whitening that resulted from it. Instead of illustrating the complexity of Afro-Puerto Rican discourse, these contemporary texts illustrate the suppression of Afrocentricity that can be traced to the publication of Gramática. As the title suggests, Santiago-Díaz places the work in modernity and views it from a cultural studies perspective, stemming from the identity politics research of black British cultural critic Paul Gilroy (The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness 1993) and the late Afro-American intellectual W.E.B. Du Bois. Du Bois’ work on double consciousness (The Souls of Black Folk 1903), that is, the duality of being both black and (North) American, explicates the problematic of identity and the complexities of it in Puerto Rico, which is rooted in multiple representations of identity (white, mixed-race, mulatto, black, etc.) Finally, he uses performance studies to illustrate that blackness is a performance that is never realized due to a colonial discourse of whiteness…

    Read the entire article here.

  • “Double Bind / Double Consciousness” in the Poetry of Carmen Colón Pellot and Julia de Burgos

    Cincinnati Romance Review
    Volume 30 (Winter 2011)
    pages 69-82

    Sonja Stephenson Watson, Director of the Women’s & Gender Studies Program; Associate Professor of Spanish
    University of Texas, Arlington

    Carmen Colón Pellot and Julia de Burgos constructed a female literary poetics and created a space for the mulata as a writing subject instead of a written object in early twentieth-century Puerto Rican negrista literature. Because of their gender and the societal norms and limitations placed upon blacks, they each found it difficult to reconcile their heritage as mulatas in a white male Hispanic society. They each testify to the “double bind” of black female authors who strive to identify themselves as both women and as blacks. In her seminal article “Feminism and Afro-Hispanism: The Double Bind,” Rosemary Feal notes that the double bind of scholars when reading texts written by Afra-Latin American writers “is to uphold the dignity of all Afro-Latin American characters…while engaging in legitimate feminist practice” (30). Feal also notes that in order to study the intersection of race and gender in works by black Latin American female writers’s texts, we must adhere to the racial, historical, and social specificities in each country. She further explains that, “‘[a]lterity’ in feminist Afro-Hispanic scholarship has as its imperative the formulation of alternate interpretive practices, and it is through analyzing the link of race and gender that we can gain more complete access to that world of difference” (30). The double bind inherent in Afra-Hispanic literature is not only that of scholars but also of the authors themselves who comprise the focus of this study. The double bind of Colón Pellot and de Burgos compels us to return to W.E.B. Du Bois’s seminal essay on double-consciousness, The Souls of Black Folk (1903), where he presented the problem of duality that plagued blacks at the turn of the twentieth century:

    It is a peculiar sensation, this double-consciousness, this sense of always looking at one’s self through the eyes of others, of measuring one’s soul by the tape of a world that looks on in amused contempt and pity. One ever feels his twoness, an American, a negro; two souls, two thoughts, two unreconciled strivings; two warring ideals in one dark body, whose dogged strength alone keeps it from being torn asunder. (5)

    Although Du Bois’s theory of double-consciousness does not include gender, it incorporates the problematic of race that African Diaspora figures continue to face in the twenty-first century. The double bind/double- consciousness of Colón Pellot and de Burgos is multiple and deals with their multiracial heritage as women of color. The present study examines the intersection of race and gender in both of their writings building upon the theoretical framework of double bind/double-consciousness as espoused by Feal and Du Bois. This analysis also builds on the work of Consuelo López Springfield and Claudette Williams who analyze the themes of gender and race separately in their studies on the single authors…

    Read the entire article here.

  • Ep.9 – Genetics and Identity

    Scientifica Radio: a CKUT radio science magazine
    CKUT 90.3 FM
    Montreal, Canada
    2017-01-27

    On today’s episode, Rackeb Tesfaye and Brïte Pauchet explore the link between genetics and identity.

    Can genetic DNA testing determine our identity? Are they overhyped?

    Amanda Morgan, a genetic counselling graduate student at McGill University, explains what genetic testing is, how it can be used, and what to take into account when you use companies like 23andme or ancestry.com.

    We then talk to Dr. Kim TallBear, Associate Professor in the Faculty of Native Studies at the University of Alberta, to discuss the intersection of genetics, Indigenous identity and cultural appropriation

    Listen to the episode here.