Mixed Race Studies

Will Today’s Hispanics Be Tomorrow’s Whites?

Slate
2014-04-15

Jamelle Bouie, staff writer covering politics, policy, and race

How Hispanics perceive themselves may shape the future of race in America.

The Trayvon Martin shooting was hardly in the national consciousness before fault lines emerged around the case. Was Martin as innocent as he seemed? Did Zimmerman fear for his life? Did Martin provoke the incident? Was Zimmerman a racist?

Perhaps most controversial among all of these was the question of identity. Yes, Trayvon Martin was black, but is Zimmerman white? For Martin’s sympathizers, the answer was yes. For Zimmerman’s, the answers ranged from “it doesn’t matter” to he “is actually a Hispanic nonracist person who acted in self-defense.”…

…According to Pew—and echoing the results in the last census—the United States is just a few decades away from its demographic inflection point. Come 2050, only 47 percent of Americans will call themselves white, while the majority will belong to a minority group. Blacks will remain steady at 13 percent of the population, while Asians will grow to 8 percent. Hispanics, on the other hand, will explode to 28 percent of all U.S. population, up from 19 percent in 2010. Immigration is driving this “demographic makeover,” specifically the “40 million immigrants who have arrived since 1965, about half of them Hispanics and nearly three-in-ten Asians.”

But the thing to remember about the Hispanic category, for instance, is that it contains a wide range of colors and ethnicities. In the United States, Hispanics (or more broadly Latinos) include Afro-Brazilians, dark-skinned Puerto Ricans, indigenous Mexicans, Venezuelan mestizos, and European Argentinians, among others.

To say that America will become a majority-minority country is to erase these distinctions and assume that, for now and forever, Latinos will remain a third race, situated next to “non-Hispanic blacks” and “non-Hispanic whites.” But, as the Zimmerman controversy illustrates, it’s not that simple…

Read the entire article here.

Improving Anti-Racist Education for Multiracial Students

University of Massachusetts, Amherst
May 2014
479 pages

Eric Hamako

Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education

This dissertation explores how anti‐racist education might be improved, so that it more effectively teaches Multiracial students about racism. A brief history of anti‐racist education and a theory of monoracism–the systematic oppression of Multiracial people–provide context for the study. Anti‐racist education in communities and colleges has supported U.S. social movements for racial justice. However, most anti‐racist education programs are not designed by or for students who identify with two or more races. Nor have such programs generally sought to address Multiraciality or monoracism. Since the 1980s, Multiraciality has become more salient in popular U.S. racial discourses. The number of people identifying as Multiracial, Mixed Race, or related terms has also increased, particularly among school‐age youth. Further, the size and number of Multiracial people’s organizations have also grown. Anti‐racist education may pose unintended challenges for Multiracial students and their organizations. This study asked twenty‐five educators involved in Multiracial organizations to discuss anti‐racist education: what it should teach Multiracial students; what is working; what is not working; and how it might be improved. Qualitative data were gathered via five focus group interviews in three West Coast cities. Participants proposed learning goals for Multiracial students. Goals included learning about privilege and oppression; social constructionism; historical and contemporary contexts of racism; and impacts of racism and monoracism on Multiracial people. Participants also called for education that develops interpersonal relationships, self‐reflection, and activism. Participants also discussed aspects of anti‐racist education that may help or hinder Multiracial students’ learning, as well as possible improvements. Participants problematized the exclusion of Multiraciality, the use of Black/White binary racial paradigms, linear racial identity development models, and the use of racial caucus groups or affinity spaces. Participants also challenged educators’ monoracist attitudes and behaviors, particularly the treatment of questions as pathological “resistance.” Suggestions included addressing Multiraciality and monoracism, accounting for intersectionality and the social construction of race, validating self‐identification, and teacher education about monoracism. The study then critically analyzes participants’ responses by drawing on literature about anti‐racist education, social justice education, multicultural education, transgender oppression (cissexism), and monoracism. Based on that synthesis, alternate recommendations for research and practice are provided.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

• ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
• ABSTRACT
• 1. INTRODUCTION
  • Significance of the problem
  • Goals and intended audiences
  • Locating myself as a researcher
  • Research questions
  • Organization of the study
• 2. FOUR CRITIQUES OF COMMUNITY‐BASED ANTI‐RACIST EDUCATION
  • A brief overview of CBARE
  • Two brief histories of CBARE
  • Anti‐intersectional praxes
  • Binary racial paradigms
  • Racial essentialism
  • Pathologizing “resistance”
  • Toward new anti‐racist praxes: Accounting for monoracism
• 3. THEORIZING MONORACISM
  • Theorizing monoracism
  • Addressing challenges to a theory of monoracism
  • Benefits of theorizing monoracism
  • Summary
• 4. METHODOLOGY
  • Focus group interview methodology
  • Participants
  • Focus groups: Number, size, and locations
  • Pre‐focus group data collection: Surveys, curricula sharing, and curricula analysis
  • Focus group data collection
  • Data analysis
• 5. LEARNING GOALS FOR MULTIRACIAL STUDENTS
  • Representational knowledge: Learn about racism and monoracism
  • Representational knowledge: Hierarchies that trouble Multiracial organizing
  • Relational knowledge: Learn to connect with other people
  • Reflective knowledge: Learn about oneself
  • Summary
• 6. DISCUSSION OF LEARNING GOALS FOR MULTIRACIAL STUDENTS
  • Representational knowledge: Learn about racism and monoracism
  • Representational knowledge: Hierarchies that trouble Multiracial organizing
  • Relational knowledge: Learn to connect with other people
  • Reflective knowledge: Learn about oneself
  • Summary
• 7. ANTI‐RACIST EDUCATION: WHAT IS WORKING AND NOT WORKING FOR MULTIRACIAL STUDENTS
  • Monoracism in anti‐racist educational theories, curricula, and pedagogies
  • Monoracism in educators’ attitudes and behaviors
  • Summary
• 8. DISCUSSION OF ANTI‐RACIST EDUCATION: WHAT IS WORKING AND NOT WORKING FOR MULTIRACIAL STUDENTS
  • Monoracism in anti‐racist educational theories, curricula, and pedagogies
  • Monoracism in educators’ attitudes and behaviors
  • Summary
• 9. CONCLUSION
• APPENDICES
  • A. RECRUITING SCRIPT
  • B. PARTICIPATION CONFIRMATION EMAIL
  • C. HUMAN SUBJECTS WRITTEN INFORMED CONSENT FORM
  • D. SURVEY 1: PARTICIPANT INTAKE SURVEY
  • E. PHONE/EMAIL REMINDER SCRIPT
  • F. SURVEY 2: CURRICULA EVALUATIONS
  • G. SURVEY 3: FOCUS GROUP PARTICIPANT WORKSHEET
  • H. FOCUS GROUP INTERVIEW PROTOCOL
  • I. MULTIRACIAL TIMELINE CURRICULUM
  • J. DESIGN A MONORACIST INSTITUTION CURRICULUM
  • K. RACIALBREAD COOKIE CURRICULUM
  • L. MULTIRACIAL POWER SHUFFLE CURRICULUM
• BIBLIOGRAPHY

Read the entire dissertation here.